Expert archetypes scoped by role, stage, sector, and geography. Ask one or run a council. Structured rulings with dissent, risks, and next actions.
Add self-serve now. Your 47-day sales cycle for a $200/mo product is losing the 80% of signups who ghost after demo request.
Enterprise AE: Self-serve dilutes positioning and drops average contract value 40%. Run 20 customer interviews first.
Ship RAG first. Fine-tuning needs 6+ weeks of data curation you don't have at this stage. RAG gives you a working product this sprint while you collect the training data for v2.
AI/ML Architect dissents: RAG adds retrieval latency and chunking complexity. If your corpus is under 50 docs, fine-tuning on GPT-4o-mini is faster to production.
A single model averages every perspective. A council surfaces where smart people disagree.
Creating a new product category can be a powerful strategy but comes with significant risks. Consider your resources, timeline, and competitive landscape before making this decision.
Probably not. 3 of 4 dissent on category creation at this stage.
Pricing, hiring, architecture, market entry, build vs buy. Paste the context.
Choose 2-7 archetypes by role, stage, domain. Or let us auto-assemble.
Agreement, dissent, confidence, risks, and concrete next actions.
Usage-based vs flat, free limits, when to raise, enterprise vs self-serve.
Auth, billing, search infra. When vendor dependency is worth it.
PM, first AE, engineer #4. Timing, profile, comp.
PLG vs outbound vs community vs partnerships. Channel fit at your stage.
Ship feature X or fix retention? Enterprise or self-serve depth?
EU now or double down US? Localize or English-only?
A hardware CTO is not a SaaS CTO. A pre-seed EU deep-tech VC is not a Series B LatAm B2C VC. Context changes the answer.
Counterintuitive positioning as competitive advantage. Asks what your product makes unnecessary.
Picks the free model with a framework. Designs onboarding around time-to-value.
Founder grit as the only signal. Reads EIC grant decks like spreadsheets.
No setup. No credit card for free. Cancel Pro anytime.
Try expert councils on real decisions.
For builders running decisions weekly.
Define domain, context, decision lens. Custom archetype tuned to your thesis, stack, or stage. Delivered in 48 hours.
| Capability | Generic AI | GetMyExperts |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-expert deliberation | Single averaged answer | 2-7 distinct perspectives |
| Structured ruling | Free-form prose | Ruling + dissent + risks + next |
| Role-specific expertise | Generic or prompt-dependent | 150+ by role, stage, sector |
| Dissent tracking | Consensus only | Minority positions preserved |
| Inspectable profiles | Black box | Philosophy, heuristics, Q&A |
A curated archetype simulating a specific practitioner's decision-making lens. Each has a defined role, stage, sector, geography. Council deliberation produces structured rulings with agreement, dissent, and next actions.
ChatGPT gives one averaged answer. GetMyExperts runs multiple distinct expert archetypes, each with their own philosophy. You get structured rulings showing agreement, dissent, risks, and next actions.
No. Fictional composites from publicly available frameworks and industry patterns. No individual endorses this product. Every archetype is inspectable.
50 council calls/month, browse all 150+ archetypes, up to 4 experts per council, structured ruling output. No credit card. Pro adds unlimited calls, unlimited interactions, history.
Yes. Define domain, role, stage, decision lens. Custom archetypes delivered within 48 hours.
Council inputs processed for ruling generation only. No training on your data. No third-party sharing. Pro history encrypted and deletable anytime.
150+ expert archetypes. Structured rulings. Free to start.